Microcellular
injection moulding is a variation of the conventional injection
moulding process. The fundamentals of the foam injection moulding
technology were first developed by Dr. Suh and his students at MIT in
the 1980s.
Microcellular
injection moulding fills a part of the volume of the plastic with air
—in the shape of microscopic vacuums, or cells. This is done by the
addition of a supercritical fluid (typically N2 or CO2) to the
polymer in order to create a homogeneous melt. Once the plastic melt
is inside the mould cavity, the pressure drop allows the
supercritical fluid (from now on, SCF) to expand and create empty
cell nuclei in the part. This has several significant advantages that
affect both the part and the process.
On
the one hand, the part becomes much lighter and less material is
needed (as a consequence of the empty cells in the microcellular
structure). Residual stresses and warpage are almost completely
eliminated because of the uniform packing phase. Lastly, there is the
possibility of manufacturing thinner and more dimensionally stable
parts than would be obtainable through the traditional process.
On
the other hand, the process is made much shorter and more
cost-effective. The cooling phase is considerably reduced, due to the
fact that there is less material that needs to be cooled. Also, the
melt becomes much more fluid with the addition of a SCF: thus, less
clamp tonnage is needed and machine size is reduced.
Additionally,
this process involves no chemical foaming agents. This makes the
plastic parts perfectly suitable for grinding and recycling.
The
advantages are considerable; nevertheless, this process also exhibits
two drawbacks. Firstly, an altered surface appearance. (This is due
to the fact that the cells at the flow front tear during mould
filling and leave micro-depressions as they freeze.) Secondly, and
perhaps more importantly, the mechanical properties of the part may
be reduced (as a consequence of most of the part being hollow).
The
morphology of the cell structure (which, in turn, affects the
mechanical properties) has been investigated from different
perspectives in the past. For this paper we selected three process
variables that were deemed the most influent. These were melt
temperature, injection speed, and dosing time. The main goal was to
establish a process window, studying the influence of these three
parameters on the microstructure of the part.
(This was an abstract to a paper I had to rewrite as an assignment for the Stanford course Writing in the Sciences. I hope it is of interest to some of you. There's still a lot of work to be done!)
No comments:
Post a Comment